Our library of practical resources is intended for researchers and research staff undertaking randomized evaluations, as well as those teaching the technique to others, and anyone interested in how randomized evaluations are conducted.
Incorporating lessons learned through our own experience and through guidance from researchers and research organizations, we provide practical advice for designing, implementing, and communicating about evaluations. These resources are a collaborative effort. We credit the authors of all the resources we post here, and link to their original work wherever possible.
Please reach out to us at [email protected] or fill out this form with questions or feedback.
Introduction to Randomized Evaluations
Resources
A non-technical overview and step-by-step introduction for those who are new to randomized evaluations, as well as case studies and other teaching resources.
Before Starting a Project
Resources
Tips on successful field management and implementation partnerships for researchers who are new to fieldwork.
Project Planning
Resources
Highlights include: annotated checklist for designing an informed consent process, detailed advice on grant proposals and budgeting, and suggestions for proactive measures to help ensure ethical principles are followed in research design and implementation.
Research Design
Resources
Data Collection and Access
Resources
This section contains guidance specific to working with surveyors or survey companies, information about administrative data collection, and information applicable to all modes of data collection, such as on data security, data quality, and grant management.
Processing and Analysis
Resources
All the steps in a research project after the data was collected or assembled, from data cleaning to communicating results.
Checklist for launching a randomized evaluation in the United States
J-PAL North America’s Evaluation Toolkit is intended for researchers, research managers, research assistants, and students trained in economic theory and research design who are preparing to launch a...
Check-list pour le lancement d’une évaluation aléatoire aux États-Unis
L’Evaluation Toolkit de J-PAL Amérique du Nord s’adresse aux chercheurs, aux chefs de projet, aux assistants de recherche et aux étudiants formés à la théorie économique et à la méthodologie de la...
Communicating with a partner about results
Randomized evaluations require collaboration and communication between many stakeholders, including academic researchers, research staff, implementing partners, holders of administrative data...
Communiquer avec un partenaire à propos des résultats
La réalisation d’une évaluation aléatoire implique une collaboration étroite et une communication régulière entre des acteurs multiples : chercheurs universitaires, personnel de recherche, partenaires...
Formalize research partnership and establish roles and expectations
This resource outlines steps to establish and build a strong working relationship with an implementing partner at the beginning of a randomized evaluation. Topics include questions to consider when...
Formaliser le partenariat de recherche et définir les rôles et les attentes
Cette ressource décrit les mesures à prendre pour mettre en place et développer une relation de travail solide avec le partenaire de mise en œuvre au début d’une évaluation aléatoire. Elle aborde...
Define intake and consent process
Far from a simple administrative step, decisions about a study’s intake and consent process are critical for the success of a study. This process can affect statistical power, bias, and the validity...
Définir la procédure d’admission et de recueil du consentement
Loin d’être une simple formalité administrative, la procédure d’admission et de recueil du consentement est une étape cruciale pour la réussite de l’étude. Du fait de son impact sur la composition de...